学习资源 / 英语历年真题 / 英语二 / 2014 年真题

做题模式

2014 年真题

44 题

作答方式

做题模式 / 阅读模式

默认进入做题模式,仅包含可评分的选择题。提交试卷后统一评分并展示解析。

做题模式

只做选择题,整卷提交评分

当前试卷的选择题会集中在这里作答,提交前可随时修改答案,提交后统一查看结果与解析。

完形填空

第 1 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 2 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 3 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 4 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 5 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 6 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 7 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 8 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 9 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 10 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 11 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 12 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 13 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 14 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 15 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 16 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 17 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 18 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 19 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

完形填空

第 20 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)

Text

Thinner isn’t always better.A number of studies have that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually .For example,heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an of good health.

Of even greater is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define.It is often defined body mass index, or BMI. BMI body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is considered obese. Obesity, , can be divided into moderately obese,severely obese,and very severely obese.

While such numerical standards seem ,they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, others with a low BMI may be in poor .For example, many collegiate and professional football players as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a BMI.

Today we have a(an) to label obesity as a disgrace.The overweight are sometimes in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes with obesity include laziness, lack of will power, and lower prospects for success. Teachers, employers, and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. very young children tend to look down on the overweight,and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.

阅读理解

第 21 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

阅读理解

第 22 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

阅读理解

第 23 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

阅读理解

第 24 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

阅读理解

第 25 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

阅读理解

第 26 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

阅读理解

第 27 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

阅读理解

第 28 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

阅读理解

第 29 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

阅读理解

第 30 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

阅读理解

第 31 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

阅读理解

第 32 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

阅读理解

第 33 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

阅读理解

第 34 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

阅读理解

第 35 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

阅读理解

第 36 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 4

When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads, railways, broadband and energy. Housing is seldom mentioned.

Why is that? To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame. We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth. Then there is the scale of the typical housing project. It is hard to shove for attention among multibillion-pound infrastructure projects, so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere. But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.

Nevertheless, the affordable housing situation is desperate. Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.

The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this. It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.

There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that. The communities minister, Don Foster, has hinted that George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt. Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted, increasing GDP by 0.6%.

Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment, which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.

But it is not just down to the government. While these measures would be welcome in the short term, we must face up to the fact that the existing £4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing, set to expire in 2015, is unlikely to be extended beyond then. The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition’s spending plans if it returns to power. The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to the era of large-scale public grants. We need to adjust to this changing climate.

While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed, the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.

The author believes that the housing sector

阅读理解

第 37 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 4

When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads, railways, broadband and energy. Housing is seldom mentioned.

Why is that? To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame. We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth. Then there is the scale of the typical housing project. It is hard to shove for attention among multibillion-pound infrastructure projects, so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere. But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.

Nevertheless, the affordable housing situation is desperate. Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.

The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this. It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.

There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that. The communities minister, Don Foster, has hinted that George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt. Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted, increasing GDP by 0.6%.

Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment, which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.

But it is not just down to the government. While these measures would be welcome in the short term, we must face up to the fact that the existing £4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing, set to expire in 2015, is unlikely to be extended beyond then. The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition’s spending plans if it returns to power. The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to the era of large-scale public grants. We need to adjust to this changing climate.

While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed, the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.

The author believes that the housing sector

It can be learned that affordable housing has

阅读理解

第 38 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 4

When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads, railways, broadband and energy. Housing is seldom mentioned.

Why is that? To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame. We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth. Then there is the scale of the typical housing project. It is hard to shove for attention among multibillion-pound infrastructure projects, so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere. But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.

Nevertheless, the affordable housing situation is desperate. Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.

The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this. It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.

There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that. The communities minister, Don Foster, has hinted that George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt. Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted, increasing GDP by 0.6%.

Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment, which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.

But it is not just down to the government. While these measures would be welcome in the short term, we must face up to the fact that the existing £4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing, set to expire in 2015, is unlikely to be extended beyond then. The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition’s spending plans if it returns to power. The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to the era of large-scale public grants. We need to adjust to this changing climate.

While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed, the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.

The author believes that the housing sector

It can be learned that affordable housing has

According to Paragraph 5, George Osborne may

阅读理解

第 39 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 4

When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads, railways, broadband and energy. Housing is seldom mentioned.

Why is that? To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame. We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth. Then there is the scale of the typical housing project. It is hard to shove for attention among multibillion-pound infrastructure projects, so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere. But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.

Nevertheless, the affordable housing situation is desperate. Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.

The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this. It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.

There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that. The communities minister, Don Foster, has hinted that George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt. Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted, increasing GDP by 0.6%.

Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment, which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.

But it is not just down to the government. While these measures would be welcome in the short term, we must face up to the fact that the existing £4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing, set to expire in 2015, is unlikely to be extended beyond then. The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition’s spending plans if it returns to power. The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to the era of large-scale public grants. We need to adjust to this changing climate.

While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed, the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.

The author believes that the housing sector

It can be learned that affordable housing has

According to Paragraph 5, George Osborne may

It can be inferred that a stable rental environment would

阅读理解

第 40 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)

Text1

What would you do with 590m? This is now a question for Gloria Mackenzie, an 84-year-old widow who recently emerged from her small, tin-roofed house in Florida to collect the biggest undivided lottery jackpot in history. If she hopes her new-found for tune will yield lasting feelings of fulfillment, she could do worse than read Happy Money by Elizabeth Dumn and Michael Norton.

These two academics use an array of behavioral research to show that the most rewarding ways to spend money can be counterintuitive. Fantasies of great wealth often involve visions of fancy cars and extravagant homes. Yet satisfaction with these material purchases wears off fairly quickly what was once exciting and new becomes old-hat; regret creeps in. It is far better to spend money on experiences, say Ms Dumn and Mr Norton, like interesting trips, unique meals or even going to the cinema. These purchases often become more aluable with timeas stories or memories-particularly if they involve feeling more connected to others.

This slim volume is packed with tips to help wage slaves as well as lottery winners get the most “happiness bang for your buck.“It seems most people would be better off if they could shorten their commutes to work, spend more time with friends and family and less of it watching television (something the average American spends a whopping two months a year doing, and is hardly jollier for it), Buying gifts or giving to charity is often more pleasurable than purchasing things for oneself, and luxuries are most en joyable when they are consumed sparingly. This is apparently the reason MacDonald’s restricts the availability of its popular MRib - a marketing trick that has turned the pork sandwich into an ob ject of obsession.

Readers of “Happyloney” are clearly a privileged lot, anxious about fulfillment, not hunger. Money may not quite buy happiness,but people in wealthier countries are generally happier than those in poor ones. Yet the link between feeling good and spending money on others can be seen among rich and poor people around the world, and scarcity enhances the pleasure of most things for most people. Not everyone will agree with the authors’ policy ideas, which range from mandating more holiday time to reducing tax incentives for American homebuyers. But most people will come away from this book believing it was money wellspent。

According to Dumn and Norton, which of the following is the most rewarding purchase?

The author’s attitude toward Americans’ watching TV is

Macrib is mentioned in paragraph 3 to show that

According to the last paragraph, Happy Money

This text mainly discusses how to

Text2

An article in Scientific American has pointed out that empirical research says that, actually, you think you’re more beautiful than you are. We have a deep- seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this. Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call the “above average effect”, or “illusory superiority”, and shown that, for example, 70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership, 93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others—all obviously statistical impossibilities.

We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we’re hot stuff.

Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more or less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, is “an automatic psychological process occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation”. If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image—which most did—they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.

Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that, those who self-enhance the most (that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem. “I don’t think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,” says Epley. “It’s a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.” If you are depressed, you won’t be self-enhancing.

Knowing the results of Epley’s study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves so viscerally—on one level, they don’t even recognise the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer’s paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyle. It’s not that people’s profiles are dishonest, says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University, “but they portray an idealized version of themselves.”

According to the first paragraph, social psychologist have found that

Visual recognition is believed to be people’s

Epley found that people with higher self-esteem tended to

The word"Viscerally”(Line 2,para.5) is closest in meaning to

It can be inferred that Facebook is selfenhancer’s paradise because people can

Text 3

The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet, it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painful side of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for good, outmoded by machines. Since technology has such an insatiable appetite for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foresee.

When there is exponential improvement in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.

This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.

Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the types of jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.

It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise their imagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.

As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against the machine as race with the machine. In other words, we need to look at the ways in which machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”

According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would

The authors of Race Against the Machine argue that

Hagel argues that jobs in the U.S. are often

According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed

Which of the following could be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 4

When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads, railways, broadband and energy. Housing is seldom mentioned.

Why is that? To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame. We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth. Then there is the scale of the typical housing project. It is hard to shove for attention among multibillion-pound infrastructure projects, so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere. But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.

Nevertheless, the affordable housing situation is desperate. Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.

The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this. It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.

There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that. The communities minister, Don Foster, has hinted that George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt. Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted, increasing GDP by 0.6%.

Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment, which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.

But it is not just down to the government. While these measures would be welcome in the short term, we must face up to the fact that the existing £4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing, set to expire in 2015, is unlikely to be extended beyond then. The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition’s spending plans if it returns to power. The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to the era of large-scale public grants. We need to adjust to this changing climate.

While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed, the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.

The author believes that the housing sector

It can be learned that affordable housing has

According to Paragraph 5, George Osborne may

It can be inferred that a stable rental environment would

The author believes that after 2015, the government may.