2013 年真题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically. $\underline{1}$ , a true cashless society is probably not around the corner. Indeed, predictions have been $\underline{2}$ for two decades but have not yet come to fruition. For example, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment would soon “revolutionize the very $\underline{3}$ of money itself,” only to $\underline{4}$ itself several years later. Why has the movement to a cashless society been so $\underline{5}$ in coming?

Although electronic means of payment may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work $\underline{6}$ the disappearance of the paper system. First, it is very $\underline{7}$ to set up the computer, card reader, and telecommunications networks necessary to make electronic money the $\underline{8}$ form of payment. Second, paper checks have the advantage that they $\underline{9}$ receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to $\underline{10}$ . Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float” – it takes several days $\underline{11}$ a check is cashed and funds are $\underline{12}$ from the issuer’s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime. $\underline{13}$ electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.

Fourth, electronic means of payment may $\underline{14}$ security and privacy concerns. We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a computer database and to alter information $\underline{15}$ there. The fact that this is not an $\underline{16}$ occurrence means that dishonest persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and $\underline{17}$ from someone else’s accounts. The $\underline{18}$ of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a new field of computer science is developing to $\underline{19}$ security issues. A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic $\underline{20}$ that contains a large amount of personal data. There are concerns that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby violating our privacy.

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

Text 4

Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, he corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly unti women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed,women hold only 14 percent of positions on Europe corporate boards

The Europe Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women-up to 60 percent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year,Europe Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to woluntary action. Reding

invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goal of 40 percent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up.

Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate Ladder fairy as they balance work and family?

“Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently.“But i like what the quotas do.“Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass celiny’ according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countris with legally bindin provisions on placing women in top business positions.

I understand Reding’s reluctance-and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, government by the capable.Bur, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered.

After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top position-no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate poweras, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook-they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule.

If appropriate pubic policies were in place to help all women–whether CEOs or their children’s caregiversand all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.

In the European corporate workplace,generally___

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

Text 4

Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, he corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly unti women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed,women hold only 14 percent of positions on Europe corporate boards

The Europe Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women-up to 60 percent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year,Europe Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to woluntary action. Reding

invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goal of 40 percent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up.

Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate Ladder fairy as they balance work and family?

“Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently.“But i like what the quotas do.“Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass celiny’ according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countris with legally bindin provisions on placing women in top business positions.

I understand Reding’s reluctance-and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, government by the capable.Bur, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered.

After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top position-no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate poweras, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook-they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule.

If appropriate pubic policies were in place to help all women–whether CEOs or their children’s caregiversand all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.

In the European corporate workplace,generally___

The European Union’s intended legislatin is

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

Text 4

Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, he corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly unti women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed,women hold only 14 percent of positions on Europe corporate boards

The Europe Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women-up to 60 percent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year,Europe Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to woluntary action. Reding

invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goal of 40 percent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up.

Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate Ladder fairy as they balance work and family?

“Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently.“But i like what the quotas do.“Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass celiny’ according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countris with legally bindin provisions on placing women in top business positions.

I understand Reding’s reluctance-and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, government by the capable.Bur, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered.

After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top position-no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate poweras, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook-they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule.

If appropriate pubic policies were in place to help all women–whether CEOs or their children’s caregiversand all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.

In the European corporate workplace,generally___

The European Union’s intended legislatin is

According to Reding,quotas may help women

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

Text 4

Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, he corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly unti women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed,women hold only 14 percent of positions on Europe corporate boards

The Europe Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women-up to 60 percent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year,Europe Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to woluntary action. Reding

invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goal of 40 percent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up.

Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate Ladder fairy as they balance work and family?

“Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently.“But i like what the quotas do.“Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass celiny’ according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countris with legally bindin provisions on placing women in top business positions.

I understand Reding’s reluctance-and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, government by the capable.Bur, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered.

After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top position-no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate poweras, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook-they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule.

If appropriate pubic policies were in place to help all women–whether CEOs or their children’s caregiversand all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.

In the European corporate workplace,generally___

The European Union’s intended legislatin is

According to Reding,quotas may help women

The author’s attitude toward Reding’s appeal is one of

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B,C or Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

In an essay entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidson relates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated: The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”

Davidson’s article is one of a number of pieces that have recently appeared making the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes today is largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession, but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.

In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra – their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will. But there’s been an acceleration. As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, [U.S.] factories shed workers so fast that they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years; roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs – about 6 million in total – disappeared.”

There will always be change – new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I. T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.

In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment, but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G. I. Bill for the 21st century that ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.

The joke in Paragraph 1 is used to illustrate

According to Paragraph 3, to be a successful employee,one has to.

The quotation in Paragraph 4 explains that

According to the author, to reduce unemployment, the most important is

Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?

Text 2

A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and 7milin people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italia immigrants, for example, eventually returned to ltaly for good. They even had an affectionate nickname,“uccelli i passaggio,” birds of passage.

Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or lll go o od we aith as - meican nnte aking o or rokun imiraion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it, We don’t need more categories,but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond stict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.

Crop pickers,violinists, construction workers,entrepreneurs, engineers, ome health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a

global economy driven by the fiow of work,money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them, They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.

With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.

Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration batle Lokin byond the cultur war logic of right or wrong means opening up the midle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes. Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.

“Birds of passage” refers to those who

It is implied in paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US

According to the author, today’s birds of passage want

The author suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated_

which is the best itle of the passage?

Text 3

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap overreactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism or open-mindedness.

But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren’t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do with eating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we’re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long.

Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and real estate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know female job screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screeners understand their biases—or hire outside screeners.

John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly “thin slice” information reliably only after we ground such snap reactions in “thick sliced” long-term study. When Dr. Gottman really wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his island retreat for a much longer evaluation: two days, not two seconds.

Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically we have spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technology might change the way we react, it hasn’t changed our nature. We still have the imaginative capacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend.

The time needed in making decisions may___.

Our reaction to a fast-food logo shows that snap decisions

To reverse the negative influences of snap decisions, we should_

John Gottman says that reliable snap reaction are based on

The author’s atitude toward reversing the high-speed trend is,

Text 4

Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, he corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly unti women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed,women hold only 14 percent of positions on Europe corporate boards

The Europe Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women-up to 60 percent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year,Europe Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to woluntary action. Reding

invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goal of 40 percent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up.

Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate Ladder fairy as they balance work and family?

“Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently.“But i like what the quotas do.“Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass celiny’ according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countris with legally bindin provisions on placing women in top business positions.

I understand Reding’s reluctance-and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, government by the capable.Bur, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered.

After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top position-no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate poweras, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook-they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule.

If appropriate pubic policies were in place to help all women–whether CEOs or their children’s caregiversand all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.

In the European corporate workplace,generally___

The European Union’s intended legislatin is

According to Reding,quotas may help women

The author’s attitude toward Reding’s appeal is one of

Women entering top management become headlines due to the lack of