学习资源 / 英语历年真题 / 英语二 / 2012 年真题

做题模式

2012 年真题

44 题

作答方式

做题模式 / 阅读模式

默认进入做题模式,仅包含可评分的选择题。提交试卷后统一评分并展示解析。

做题模式

只做选择题,整卷提交评分

当前试卷的选择题会集中在这里作答,提交前可随时修改答案,提交后统一查看结果与解析。

完形填空

第 1 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 2 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 3 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 4 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 5 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 6 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 7 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 8 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 9 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 10 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 11 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 12 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 13 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 14 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 15 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 16 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 17 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 18 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 19 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

完形填空

第 20 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)

Text

Millions of Americans and foreigners see G.I. Joe as a mindless war toy, the symbol of American military adventurism, but that’s not how it used to be. To the men and women who in World War II and the people they liberated, the G.I. was the man grown into hero, the poor farm kid torn away from his home, the guy who all the burdens of battle, who slept in cold foxholes, who went without the of food and shelter, who stuck it out and drove back the Nazi reign of murder. This was not a volunteer soldier, not someone well paid, an average guy, up the best trained, best equipped, fiercest, most brutal enemies in centuries.

His name isn’t much. G.I. is just a military abbreviation Government Issue, and it was on all of the articles to soldiers. And Joe? A common name for a guy who never it to the top. Joe Blow, Joe Palooka, Joe Magrac…a working class name. The United States has had a president or vice-president or secretary of state Joe.

G.I. Joe had a career fighting German, Japanese, and Korean troops. He appears as a character, or a of American personalities, in the 1945 movie The Story of G.I. Joe, based on the last days of war correspondent Ernie Pyle. Some of the soldiers Pyle portrayed themselves in the film. Pyle was famous for covering the side of the war, writing about the dirt-snow-and-mud soldiers, not how many miles were or what towns were captured or liberated. His reports the “Willie” cartoons of famed Stars and Stripes artist Bill Mauldin. Both men the dirt and exhaustion of war, the of civilization that the soldiers shared with each other and the civilians: coffee, tobacco, whiskey, shelter, sleep. Egypt, France, and a dozen more countries, G.I. Joe was any American soldier, the most important person in their lives.

阅读理解

第 21 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

阅读理解

第 22 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

阅读理解

第 23 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

阅读理解

第 24 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

阅读理解

第 25 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

阅读理解

第 26 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

阅读理解

第 27 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

阅读理解

第 28 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

阅读理解

第 29 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

阅读理解

第 30 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

阅读理解

第 31 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

阅读理解

第 32 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

阅读理解

第 33 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

阅读理解

第 34 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

阅读理解

第 35 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

阅读理解

第 36 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

Text 4

The great recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably beginning. Before it ends, It will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. And ultimately, it is likely to reshape our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years.

No one tries harder than the jobless to find silver linings in this national economic disaster. Many said that unemployment, while extremely painful, had improved them in some ways; they had become less materialistic and more financially prudent; they were more aware of the struggles of others. In limited respects, perhaps the recession will leave society better off. At the very least, it has awoken us from our national fever dream of easy riches and bigger houses, and put a necessary end to an era of reckless personal spending.

But for the most part, these benefits seem thin, uncertain, and far off. In The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, the economic historian Benjamin Friedman argues that both inside and outside the U.S., lengthy periods of economic stagnation or decline have almost always left society more mean-spirited and less inclusive, and have usually stopped or reversed the advance of rights and freedoms. Anti-immigrant sentiment typically increases, as does conflict between races and classes.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one. Indeed, this period of economic weakness may reinforce class divides, and decrease opportunities to cross them—especially for young people. The research of Till Von Wachter, the economist in Columbia University, suggests that not all people graduating into a recession see their life chances dimmed: those with degrees from elite universities catch up fairly quickly to where they otherwise would have been if they had graduated in better times; it is the masses beneath them that are left behind.

In the internet age, it is particularly easy to see the resentment that has always been hidden within American society. More difficult, in the moment, is discerning precisely how these lean times are affecting society’s character. In many respects, the U.S. was more socially tolerant entering this recession than at any time in its history, and a variety of national polls on social conflict since then have shown mixed results. We will have to wait and see exactly how these hard times will reshape our social fabric. But they certainly will reshape it, and all the more so the longer they extend.

By saying “to find silver linings”( Line 1Para.2) the author suggest that the jobless try to

阅读理解

第 37 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

Text 4

The great recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably beginning. Before it ends, It will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. And ultimately, it is likely to reshape our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years.

No one tries harder than the jobless to find silver linings in this national economic disaster. Many said that unemployment, while extremely painful, had improved them in some ways; they had become less materialistic and more financially prudent; they were more aware of the struggles of others. In limited respects, perhaps the recession will leave society better off. At the very least, it has awoken us from our national fever dream of easy riches and bigger houses, and put a necessary end to an era of reckless personal spending.

But for the most part, these benefits seem thin, uncertain, and far off. In The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, the economic historian Benjamin Friedman argues that both inside and outside the U.S., lengthy periods of economic stagnation or decline have almost always left society more mean-spirited and less inclusive, and have usually stopped or reversed the advance of rights and freedoms. Anti-immigrant sentiment typically increases, as does conflict between races and classes.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one. Indeed, this period of economic weakness may reinforce class divides, and decrease opportunities to cross them—especially for young people. The research of Till Von Wachter, the economist in Columbia University, suggests that not all people graduating into a recession see their life chances dimmed: those with degrees from elite universities catch up fairly quickly to where they otherwise would have been if they had graduated in better times; it is the masses beneath them that are left behind.

In the internet age, it is particularly easy to see the resentment that has always been hidden within American society. More difficult, in the moment, is discerning precisely how these lean times are affecting society’s character. In many respects, the U.S. was more socially tolerant entering this recession than at any time in its history, and a variety of national polls on social conflict since then have shown mixed results. We will have to wait and see exactly how these hard times will reshape our social fabric. But they certainly will reshape it, and all the more so the longer they extend.

By saying “to find silver linings”( Line 1Para.2) the author suggest that the jobless try to

According to Paragraph 2,the recession has made people

阅读理解

第 38 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

Text 4

The great recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably beginning. Before it ends, It will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. And ultimately, it is likely to reshape our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years.

No one tries harder than the jobless to find silver linings in this national economic disaster. Many said that unemployment, while extremely painful, had improved them in some ways; they had become less materialistic and more financially prudent; they were more aware of the struggles of others. In limited respects, perhaps the recession will leave society better off. At the very least, it has awoken us from our national fever dream of easy riches and bigger houses, and put a necessary end to an era of reckless personal spending.

But for the most part, these benefits seem thin, uncertain, and far off. In The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, the economic historian Benjamin Friedman argues that both inside and outside the U.S., lengthy periods of economic stagnation or decline have almost always left society more mean-spirited and less inclusive, and have usually stopped or reversed the advance of rights and freedoms. Anti-immigrant sentiment typically increases, as does conflict between races and classes.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one. Indeed, this period of economic weakness may reinforce class divides, and decrease opportunities to cross them—especially for young people. The research of Till Von Wachter, the economist in Columbia University, suggests that not all people graduating into a recession see their life chances dimmed: those with degrees from elite universities catch up fairly quickly to where they otherwise would have been if they had graduated in better times; it is the masses beneath them that are left behind.

In the internet age, it is particularly easy to see the resentment that has always been hidden within American society. More difficult, in the moment, is discerning precisely how these lean times are affecting society’s character. In many respects, the U.S. was more socially tolerant entering this recession than at any time in its history, and a variety of national polls on social conflict since then have shown mixed results. We will have to wait and see exactly how these hard times will reshape our social fabric. But they certainly will reshape it, and all the more so the longer they extend.

By saying “to find silver linings”( Line 1Para.2) the author suggest that the jobless try to

According to Paragraph 2,the recession has made people

Benjamin Friedman believed that economic recession may.

阅读理解

第 39 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

Text 4

The great recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably beginning. Before it ends, It will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. And ultimately, it is likely to reshape our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years.

No one tries harder than the jobless to find silver linings in this national economic disaster. Many said that unemployment, while extremely painful, had improved them in some ways; they had become less materialistic and more financially prudent; they were more aware of the struggles of others. In limited respects, perhaps the recession will leave society better off. At the very least, it has awoken us from our national fever dream of easy riches and bigger houses, and put a necessary end to an era of reckless personal spending.

But for the most part, these benefits seem thin, uncertain, and far off. In The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, the economic historian Benjamin Friedman argues that both inside and outside the U.S., lengthy periods of economic stagnation or decline have almost always left society more mean-spirited and less inclusive, and have usually stopped or reversed the advance of rights and freedoms. Anti-immigrant sentiment typically increases, as does conflict between races and classes.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one. Indeed, this period of economic weakness may reinforce class divides, and decrease opportunities to cross them—especially for young people. The research of Till Von Wachter, the economist in Columbia University, suggests that not all people graduating into a recession see their life chances dimmed: those with degrees from elite universities catch up fairly quickly to where they otherwise would have been if they had graduated in better times; it is the masses beneath them that are left behind.

In the internet age, it is particularly easy to see the resentment that has always been hidden within American society. More difficult, in the moment, is discerning precisely how these lean times are affecting society’s character. In many respects, the U.S. was more socially tolerant entering this recession than at any time in its history, and a variety of national polls on social conflict since then have shown mixed results. We will have to wait and see exactly how these hard times will reshape our social fabric. But they certainly will reshape it, and all the more so the longer they extend.

By saying “to find silver linings”( Line 1Para.2) the author suggest that the jobless try to

According to Paragraph 2,the recession has made people

Benjamin Friedman believed that economic recession may.

The research of Till Von Wachther suggests that in recession graduates from elite universities to

阅读理解

第 40 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing , , or . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)

Text 1

Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, LA. Unied has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.

This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.

District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.

At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district find homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does contribute to student achievement, the homework should be assigned, and teachers should be paid to review and correct it.

The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for LA Unified to do homework right.

It is implied in paragraph 1 that nowadays homework

L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students

According to Paragraph 3,one problem with the policy is that it may

As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether

A suitable title for this text could be

Text 2

Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is a tiny slice of the rainbow, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls’ not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls lives and interest.

Girls’attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti an associate professor of American Studies, it’s not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matte, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What’s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimation of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children’s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into is own, when it began to seem innately attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years. I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler, I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.

Trade publications counseled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a third “stepping stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became common shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences- or invent them where they did not previously exist.

By saying “it is…The rainbow”(line 3, Para 1), the author means pink

According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true?

The author suggests that our perception of children’s psychological devotement was much influenced by

We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised

It can be concluded that girls’ attraction to pink seems

Text 3

In 2010.a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29h they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.

But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it, and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule is no less a product of nature… than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.

AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain. firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots, explains Hans Sartor, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.

It can be learned from paragraph 1 that the biotech companies would like

Those who are against gene patents believe that

According to Hans Saue, companies are eager to win patents for

By saying “each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that

Generally speaking, the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is

Text 4

The great recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably beginning. Before it ends, It will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. And ultimately, it is likely to reshape our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years.

No one tries harder than the jobless to find silver linings in this national economic disaster. Many said that unemployment, while extremely painful, had improved them in some ways; they had become less materialistic and more financially prudent; they were more aware of the struggles of others. In limited respects, perhaps the recession will leave society better off. At the very least, it has awoken us from our national fever dream of easy riches and bigger houses, and put a necessary end to an era of reckless personal spending.

But for the most part, these benefits seem thin, uncertain, and far off. In The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, the economic historian Benjamin Friedman argues that both inside and outside the U.S., lengthy periods of economic stagnation or decline have almost always left society more mean-spirited and less inclusive, and have usually stopped or reversed the advance of rights and freedoms. Anti-immigrant sentiment typically increases, as does conflict between races and classes.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one. Indeed, this period of economic weakness may reinforce class divides, and decrease opportunities to cross them—especially for young people. The research of Till Von Wachter, the economist in Columbia University, suggests that not all people graduating into a recession see their life chances dimmed: those with degrees from elite universities catch up fairly quickly to where they otherwise would have been if they had graduated in better times; it is the masses beneath them that are left behind.

In the internet age, it is particularly easy to see the resentment that has always been hidden within American society. More difficult, in the moment, is discerning precisely how these lean times are affecting society’s character. In many respects, the U.S. was more socially tolerant entering this recession than at any time in its history, and a variety of national polls on social conflict since then have shown mixed results. We will have to wait and see exactly how these hard times will reshape our social fabric. But they certainly will reshape it, and all the more so the longer they extend.

By saying “to find silver linings”( Line 1Para.2) the author suggest that the jobless try to

According to Paragraph 2,the recession has made people

Benjamin Friedman believed that economic recession may.

The research of Till Von Wachther suggests that in recession graduates from elite universities to

The author thinks that the influence of hard times on society is