学习资源 / 英语历年真题 / 英语一 / 2020 年真题

做题模式

2020 年真题

44 题

作答方式

做题模式 / 阅读模式

默认进入做题模式,仅包含可评分的选择题。提交试卷后统一评分并展示解析。

做题模式

只做选择题,整卷提交评分

当前试卷的选择题会集中在这里作答,提交前可随时修改答案,提交后统一查看结果与解析。

完形填空

第 1 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 2 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 3 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 4 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 5 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 6 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 7 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 8 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 9 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 10 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 11 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 12 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 13 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 14 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 15 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 16 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 17 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 18 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 19 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

完形填空

第 20 题

完形填空

Directions

Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

Text

Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this should be rendered yet another, quality pleasure to damage our health.

The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked high temperatures. This means that people should crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no evidence that it causes cancer in humans.

Scientists say the compound is to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof. the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is to follow the FSA advice. , it was rumourde that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a .

Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be. up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods , but reduce their lifetime intake. However its risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just with no one listening.

阅读理解

第 21 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

阅读理解

第 22 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

阅读理解

第 23 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

阅读理解

第 24 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

阅读理解

第 25 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

阅读理解

第 26 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

阅读理解

第 27 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

阅读理解

第 28 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

阅读理解

第 29 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

阅读理解

第 30 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

阅读理解

第 31 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

阅读理解

第 32 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

阅读理解

第 33 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

阅读理解

第 34 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

阅读理解

第 35 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

阅读理解

第 36 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France.Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such services. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a “GAFA tax,” meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multinational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measur, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital srvces tais at f ra muoh arertrer,. wih cuntris over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britin’s DPT (diverted profits tax).

Australia’s MAAL(mulinationalantiavoidance law),andIndia’ SEP (significant economic presence) test,to name but a few.At the same time, the European Union. Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated igial serics acs.

These uniaeral developments diffe n heir spefics, u they ar aldigned to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep up with the current cconomy.

In response to these many unilateral measures,the Organization for Economi Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currenly working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020on an intermational solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization’s work, but France’s digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system. France’s planned ax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companics will ace a cascade of different taxes fom dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

The French Senate has passed a bill to

阅读理解

第 37 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France.Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such services. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a “GAFA tax,” meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multinational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measur, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital srvces tais at f ra muoh arertrer,. wih cuntris over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britin’s DPT (diverted profits tax).

Australia’s MAAL(mulinationalantiavoidance law),andIndia’ SEP (significant economic presence) test,to name but a few.At the same time, the European Union. Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated igial serics acs.

These uniaeral developments diffe n heir spefics, u they ar aldigned to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep up with the current cconomy.

In response to these many unilateral measures,the Organization for Economi Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currenly working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020on an intermational solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization’s work, but France’s digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system. France’s planned ax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companics will ace a cascade of different taxes fom dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

The French Senate has passed a bill to

It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax

阅读理解

第 38 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France.Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such services. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a “GAFA tax,” meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multinational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measur, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital srvces tais at f ra muoh arertrer,. wih cuntris over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britin’s DPT (diverted profits tax).

Australia’s MAAL(mulinationalantiavoidance law),andIndia’ SEP (significant economic presence) test,to name but a few.At the same time, the European Union. Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated igial serics acs.

These uniaeral developments diffe n heir spefics, u they ar aldigned to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep up with the current cconomy.

In response to these many unilateral measures,the Organization for Economi Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currenly working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020on an intermational solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization’s work, but France’s digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system. France’s planned ax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companics will ace a cascade of different taxes fom dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

The French Senate has passed a bill to

It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax

The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that

阅读理解

第 39 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France.Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such services. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a “GAFA tax,” meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multinational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measur, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital srvces tais at f ra muoh arertrer,. wih cuntris over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britin’s DPT (diverted profits tax).

Australia’s MAAL(mulinationalantiavoidance law),andIndia’ SEP (significant economic presence) test,to name but a few.At the same time, the European Union. Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated igial serics acs.

These uniaeral developments diffe n heir spefics, u they ar aldigned to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep up with the current cconomy.

In response to these many unilateral measures,the Organization for Economi Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currenly working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020on an intermational solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization’s work, but France’s digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system. France’s planned ax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companics will ace a cascade of different taxes fom dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

The French Senate has passed a bill to

It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax

The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that

It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO’s current work

阅读理解

第 40 题

阅读理解

Part A

Directions

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “own of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in e220m of investment and an avalache of arts,out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bi to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of selt. celebration in its desperation to reinvent itsef for the post- Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will fllwvillage of culure? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culure?

It is also wise to recall that such tiles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgows year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiaritis-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilies and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

Copper and her colleague argue that a “town of culture"award would

According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as

The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it

Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present

What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money.Scientists nee joumnals in which to publish their research, so they will supply the articls without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only find a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very pricsensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25% of the scientifi papers produced in the world, made profits of more than c900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than E210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate eforts te change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accesed, shows the legal cosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms, either freeyavalable from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their witers fees. to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around E500 to S5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these “article preparation costs” had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation.

In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places, in both cas, we need a rebalancing of power

Scientific publishing is seen as"a licence to print money” partly because

According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have

How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms

Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

Text 3

Progressives ofen support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too ofen such policies are an insincere form.of vitue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does litle to help average people.

A pair of bils sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing govermment quotas. If the bil become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. in signing the measure, Califormia Govermor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies pople on the basis of sex, isprobably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classification unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to al bards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constirutional guarante of “equal protection”,

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currenly miror the percentage of women in the general population,but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing withou government interference, According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring ompanis to aknde thprimary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide orporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic.Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt “phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up.multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will

Which of the following is true of the California measure?

The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate

Norway’s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to

Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France.Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such services. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a “GAFA tax,” meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multinational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measur, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital srvces tais at f ra muoh arertrer,. wih cuntris over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britin’s DPT (diverted profits tax).

Australia’s MAAL(mulinationalantiavoidance law),andIndia’ SEP (significant economic presence) test,to name but a few.At the same time, the European Union. Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated igial serics acs.

These uniaeral developments diffe n heir spefics, u they ar aldigned to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep up with the current cconomy.

In response to these many unilateral measures,the Organization for Economi Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currenly working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020on an intermational solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization’s work, but France’s digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system. France’s planned ax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companics will ace a cascade of different taxes fom dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

The French Senate has passed a bill to

It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax

The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that

It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO’s current work

Which of the following might be the best title for this text?